Close Menu
Ghana ElectionsGhana Elections
  • Elections
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Social
  • Editor Picks
  • Technology
  • Sports

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Mahama Ayariga confirmed as Majority Leader

I trust Haruna Iddrisu’s ability to excel as Education Minister – Ntim Fordjour

Mahama’s inauguration: Burkina Faso’s Traore’s sidearm and its implication

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
Ghana ElectionsGhana Elections
  • Elections
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Social
  • Editor Picks
  • Technology
  • Sports
Subscribe
Ghana ElectionsGhana Elections
You are at:Home»News»Lithium deal: Why is approval of recommendation letter, mining lease bearing same date? – Tamale Central MP quizzes
News

Lithium deal: Why is approval of recommendation letter, mining lease bearing same date? – Tamale Central MP quizzes

Ghana ElectionBy Ghana ElectionDecember 12, 2023No Comments3 Mins Read
WhatsApp Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn
Lithium deal: Why is approval of recommendation letter, mining lease bearing same date? – Tamale Central MP quizzes
MP for Tamale Central, Murtala Muhammed
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Email

The Member of Parliament for Tamale Central, Ibrahim Murtala Muhammed, has raised concerns over the lithium mining deal between the government and Barari DV Ghana Limited, pointing out that the approval of the recommendation letter and the mining lease bear the same date.

According to him, this raises questions about the haste with which the deal was finalised.

“Another issue that indeed is making people wonder is the rush by the ministry to do what they did. If you study, the approval of the recommendation letter by the minister and the mining lease agreement reveal that they both bear the same date. So, is it that they looked at the approval of the letter and the lease on the same day?” he quizzed in an interview on Metro TV on December 12, 2023.

Muhammed went on to criticise the government’s assertion that the lithium deal is the best in the world.

He argued that while Ghana negotiated an increase in royalties from 5% to 10%, the amended Minerals and Mining Act 703 (2006), specifically in section 25, allows the ministry to prescribe the royalty rate only based on negotiations.

“For him to say that this argument is the best in the world is where I find problematic. In Ghana here, you can say that on the basis of the fact that, we have been able to negotiate to increase the royalties from 5% to 10%.

“But it is important for us to look at the amended Minerals and Mining Act 703 (2006), specifically section 25. It says that the ministry may prescribe the royalty rate. There isn’t any specificity as to what the royalty rate will be, it depends on what the ministry describes based on the negotiations. It is important for us to understand that this will be a pioneer lease of lithium that we are having with any entity. Therefore, you cannot arrange a particular royalty rate with one entity or company and then another company comes to do the same and then you want to have a variation,” he stated.

The MP further pointed at the importance of considering section 110 (u) of the same Act, which empowers the minister to regulate and prescribe a specific royalty rate through a Legislative Instrument (LI).

Ibrahim Murtala Muhammed argued that the minister’s provision of a 10% royalty rate is not specific and that utilising an LI would allow for flexibility in determining rates for different companies.

This, he believes, will get Ghana better deals in leasing out lithium to companies who are interested in the mineral in the future.

“That is why civil society organisations and other people are calling that the minister should have looked at the same Act, specifically section 110 (u) which states that; among others, the minister, can or may regulate through Legislative Instrument (LI), prescribe a specific royalty rate. So, what the minister has provided, that is the 10% is not specific.

“The same section provides the minister with the opportunity to bring an LI to parliament in terms of determining a specific rate such that if you have another company coming in to engage in the same venture then you can get a specific rate that every company that comes has a different rate. For me, not doing this is problematic,” the MP added.

 

Source: ghanaweb.com

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Email
Previous ArticleLet’s know when you would be available to receive our petition – Minority to BOG governor
Next Article Christian Council, Chief Imam’s office reject govt’s Lithium deal
Ghana Election
  • Website

Related Posts

Mahama Ayariga confirmed as Majority Leader

January 23, 2025

I trust Haruna Iddrisu’s ability to excel as Education Minister – Ntim Fordjour

January 23, 2025

Mahama’s inauguration: Burkina Faso’s Traore’s sidearm and its implication

January 23, 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

NDC USA CONGRATULATES PROF. JANE NAANA OPOKU-AGYEMANG ON HER NOMINATION AS RUNNING MATE TO H.E JOHN MAHAMA

March 8, 2024190 Views

AFAG’s CONDEMNATION OF HON. ASIEDU NKETIAH: A POLITICALLY MOTIVATED AND MISCALCULATED MOVE

September 19, 2024148 Views

Dr. Spio-Garbrah tipped to partner Mahama

March 5, 2024143 Views

Nacee projects NDC’s ‘24-hour Economy’ policy in new campaign songs

September 11, 2024116 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
© 2025 Ghana Elections
  • Elections
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Social
  • Editor Picks
  • Technology
  • Sports

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.